The content lifecycle. It’s the foundation to a successful content marketing operation. And while specific language on exactly what to call each stage of the lifecycle varies based on who you talk to, the principals are the same: align, execute, distribute, and analyze.
- Align is your planning stage, ensuring all stakeholders are aware and aligned on campaign and content progress
- Execution involves the actual process of content creation and project management, ensuring deadlines are met and workflows are seamless
- Distribution requires delivering high-quality assets to a targeted audience across tools and channels
- Analysis is your time to assess success, failures, and values of both specific content and larger campaigns
All of these steps together create a perfect synthesis for a seamless, scalable content operation, which can be optimized with each and every iteration.
Related: “Ask the Experts: Content Operations and Marketing Success”
Overcoming the Content Lifecycle According to 7 Content Marketing Experts
Nevertheless, even the most sophisticated marketers struggle to keep the content operation wheels turning—unexpected challenges constantly seem to surface. So, we turned to best-in-class content experts to hear the common pain points and barriers they experience on their path to content ops optimization.
What is the biggest challenge you face when it comes to managing the content lifecycle?
For my clients, the most common challenge is lack of cross-functional buy-in and silos of teams hanging onto control of their perceived turf. The problem with this is that we’re supposed to be sharing a united story with our buyers and customers. It’s hard to get this right when teams are off doing their own thing without visibility or coordination with others who are interacting with the same audience.
We’ve made a wholesale shift in our marketing strategy. We’ve gone “all in” on an account-based marketing model. The biggest challenge is that there’s no “Definitive Guide to ABM” off of which we can model our program. We’re literally inventing the model as we go. For all the eye-rolling the glut of marketing guides have engendered, the truth is, their value is made clear by their absence. Specifically, the most challenging aspect of ABM is that it requires much more than sales/marketing alignment. It demands sales/marketing “integration.” We meet with our BDR team and literally hand-select accounts that we’re going to pursue, and then orchestrate together a communications cadence comprised of sales plays and marketing plays. It’s incredibly bespoke. Doing that at scale is challenging.
I believe the biggest challenge that is faced by B2B marketing organizations, in terms of content, is there’s a lack of understanding of the buyer and their purchase process.
So many organizations are producing content, but they are not truly content marketers. This is evidenced by the lack of success metrics around content as shown by my firm ANNUITAS and the study put out each year by Content Marketing Institute and MarketingProfs.
So when organizations try to develop a “content strategy” without any insight into their buyers (and keep in mind in most time it’s multiple people in a buying committee), they struggle and would be better off not putting in the time, money or resources.
I’m fortunate to work at an organization with no shortage of gifted writers or incredible perspectives to share. At Gainsight, we build products and facilitate community for the Customer Success industry. Our own Customer Success Managers come to Gainsight with the expectation of serving as both champions of their customers as well as thought leaders and contributors to the Customer Success conversation.
Add in a CEO who likes to write and a never ending list of marketing campaigns to execute on, and all of a sudden, you’ve got busy skies requiring air traffic control.
Our biggest challenge is ensuring that we’re able to distribute all of the great content that our team and partners are creating, while both (a) executing on our marketing programs that ultimately fill our funnel, and (b) do not overwhelm our database of prospects and customers. It’s a difficult proposition, especially in early and evangelical markets where the need to exchange and process content is paramount.
Our target audience can be somewhat fluid, and tends to chase successes from the sales team. Our biggest challenge is getting executive buy-in on a content strategy and then being allowed to execute on it without pivots.
Widespread dissatisfaction with the status quo – a conviction that current systems are not just suboptimal, but hurting the ability to do business. This creates urgency. A Content Operations group with determination, influence, and vision—and the ability to drive and execute change. You need great project managers and content curators on that team, and a good dose of technical skills for developing the tools to manage and measure content. VP-level sponsors who will advocate for the program; committed director-level partners across the commercial organization who will contribute resources; and individual-contributor partners around the globe to provide a street-level view of the truth and execute on change.
In web analytics, we look at a metric like “time on site” and believe that a higher value is better. But what if the visitor scrambled to find what she wanted, kept trying at it, then gave up and left? To draw an analogy to content, I can look at influenced opportunities and pipeline for an eBook, but that may not paint the entire picture.
If a person read an eBook along the journey of becoming a customer, we give positive attribution to the eBook. But what if it served to prolong the sales cycle? Or, what if the user read the first page, closed it in disgust, then purchased your product anyway?
As creators of content, we miss out on qualitative feedback like this. We simply associate “opportunity influenced” with “good.” I’d love to have a system that helps me collect this sort of reader feedback at scale.